Notice: COVID-19 Information

European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity

Basic Journal Info

Country: Germany
Journal ISSN: 18616909, 18137253
Publisher: Springer Verlag
History: 2006-ongoing
Journal Hompage: Link
Note:

Research Categories

Medicine

Impact Factor Ranking

European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity

0

Scope/Description:

The European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) is the official journal of EGREPA. It includes reviews on issues related to physical activity and aging in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. It covers topics from biochemistry, biomechanics, clinical sciences, ethics and philosophy, geriatrics, gerontology, health, motor learning and motor control, orthopedics, research methods, immunology, nutrition, pedagogy, physiology, psychology, sociology, test and measurement, and training. EURAPA offers the scientific community in-depth literature reviews from distinguished scholars, meta-analytically based reviews, and introductory reviews for researchers and practitioners wishing to look beyond the borders of their specialization.


European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity | Journal Impact Factor 2021 Trends

Impact Factor Trend 2000 - 2021

Impact Factor

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric factor based on the yearly average number of citations on articles published by a particular journal in the last two years. In other words, the impact factor of 2021 is the average of the number of cited publications divided by the citable publications of a journal. A journal impact factor is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field. Normally, journals with higher impact factors are often deemed to have more influence than those with lower ones. However, the science community has also noted that review articles typically are more citable than research articles.Here you can check the journal performance trends based on last 20 years of data, also check the latest journal citation reports 2021. Also Check H-Index, SCImago journal rank and journal impact factor 2021.

Read More

European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity

Impact Factor History

  • 2020/2021 Impact Factor NA
  • 2019 Impact Factor NA
  • 2018 Impact Factor 2.857
  • 2017 Impact Factor 3.478
  • 2016 Impact Factor 2.593
  • 2015 Impact Factor 1.469
  • 2014 Impact Factor 0.909
  • 2013 Impact Factor 1.385
  • 2012 Impact Factor 1.238
  • 2011 Impact Factor 1.444
  • 2010 Impact Factor 1.278
  • 2009 Impact Factor 1.150
  • 2008 Impact Factor 1.000
  • 2007 Impact Factor 0.727
  • 2006 Impact Factor NA
  • 2005 Impact Factor NA
  • 2004 Impact Factor NA
  • 2003 Impact Factor NA
  • 2002 Impact Factor NA
  • 2001 Impact Factor NA
  • 2000 Impact Factor NA

Note: impact factor data for reference only

Other Journal Impact Indicator

Any journal impact factor or scientometric indicator alone will not give you the full picture of a science journal. That’s why every year, scholars review current metrics to improve upon them and sometimes come up with new ones. There are also other factors to sider for example, H-Index, Self-Citation Ratio, SJR (SCImago Journal Rank Indicator) and SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper). Researchers may also consider the practical aspect of a journal such as publication fees, acceptance rate, review speed.

Read More

European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity

H-Index

The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar. The index is based on the set of the scientist's most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received in other publications

21

European Reviews of Aging and Physical Activity

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR indicator) is a measure of scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from.

0.92


Ratings

by Authors/Academicians